p.38, lin.21: pro quaedam inserta lege Cone. Aurelianense I, cap.19 [MGH Legum Sectio 3, tom.1, ed. F.Maassen (1893), 7] et Cone. Epanoense capp.19 et 22 [ed. laud. 24], Q. 14, p.41, lin.4 ab imo: totus codex scriptus est anno 1425. Q. 18, p.55, lin.3, adde: Catal. Translat, et Comment., vol.3, ed. F.E.Cranz - P. O.Kristeller (1976), 223a. Q_.20, p.59, lin.7/6 ab imo: pro prflkp, etc., lege prfckp ... i.e. In precio precium, etc. Q. 25, p.69, lin.27, pro magni or lege magni(fi)co; lin.28, pro q(ui) —finu(n)t lege q(ue) semelfiunt\ lin.34, pro inanifesta lege manifesta; lin.37, pro fuios —fuios lege fuillos valent xix queers, iiiifuillos (i.e. 156ff. vel 19 quaterniones et 4ff.). Q..28, p.74, lin.13, post 415], adde: Gesta Salvatoris, ed. H.C.Kim (Toronto Medieval Latin Texts 2, 1973). Q.30, p.81, lin.5 ab imo, adde: Petronii Cena Trimalchionis, ed. M.S.Smith (1975), <xxxv>; B.Ch.Barker-Benfield, A Ninth-century Manuscript from Fleury: “Cato de senectute cum Macrobio” (Essays presented to R.W.Hunt. Ed. by J.G.Alexander and M.T.Gibson (1976), 161 adn.4; A.C.de la Mare, The Return of Petronius to Italy [ibidem), 221, adn.1. p.82, lin.3: pro Hamburger lege Homburger. Q.33, p.85, lin.6 ab imo: F.58 membrum disjectum ex cod. Sangallensi 65 teste B.Ch.Barker-Benfield in The Classical Review, N.S. 27, 1977, 252sq. p.87, lin. 15, adde\ B.Hertenstein, Joachim von Watt (Vadianus), Bartholomaus Schobinger, Melchior Goldast (1975), 103, 104, 156. Q,34, p.95, lin.ult., pro 191 lege 190. 0-38, p. 103, lin.24: Prov. non Andegavum est teste J.Vezin, Les Scriptoria d’Angers au xi e siècle (1974), 43 adn.24. Ibidem, lin.ult., adde\ J.Vezin, Les “Scriptoria” d’Angers au xi e siècle (Bibl. de 1’Ecole des Hautes Études, fase.322, 1974), 31, 43-44, 67 adn.23. O-40, p.107, post lin.ult., adde: litt.: L.Mez-Mangold, Aus der Geschichte des Medikaments [1971], 46 ( = f.49 v ). Q.42, p.111, lin.2, post ps.-ovidii adde: vel basilii.