Th. Stangl, Ciceronis Orationum Scholiastae, 2 (1912), <281>-351]: (l r -3 v lin. 3) in divinationem in q,. caegilium: (l r -2 v ) 3...]. n\unc\. a[dforet], h[ector\. ergo hominum auxilium - 8 [ed. laud. 324.1-326.21]; (3 r ~ v ) 71-fin. [ed. laud. 327.13- 328.7]; (3 V lin. 3) subscr.: Expl(icit) divinatio; (3 V lin. 4-2 0 V ) in or. in verrem: Incipit actio prima: Quod erat optandum, etc., i.e. (lin. 4—10 v ) Act. 1.1—21 [ed. laud. 328.8-337.27]; (1T-16^) Act. n.1 exordium-5; 45-62 [ed. laud. <341>-344.7; 344.9-348]; (17 r - v ) Act. 1.16-20 [ed. laud. <349>-350.13]; (18 r-v ) Act. 1.26-30 [ed. laud. 350.14-351]; (19 r “ v ) Act. 1.30-33 [ed. laud. 337.28-339.4]; (20 r “ v ) Act. 1.38-45 [ed. laud. 339.5-340]; (21 r -28 v ) in or. in catilinam: (21 r-v ) n.11 fugit ad translatione(m) bonam-lQ [ed. laud. <281).13— 282.25]; (22 r ~ v ) n.23-fin. (22 v lin. 6-7: lib. II finit./incipit III argumentu(m)); m-2 [ed. laud. 282.29-284.5]; (23 r -25 r lin. 4) m.l4-fin.; (lin. 4-5) finit lib(er) III./incipit IIII; (lin. 6-28 v ) iy [ed. laud. 284.11-290]; (28 v ) subscr.: finit liber IIII; (29 r -32 v lin. 6) in or. pro ligario [ed. laud. 291.4-295.6]: (lin. 1) Incip(it) pro Ligario: Quintus ligarius, etc.; (32 v lin. 6) subscr.: finit pro Ligario-, (32 v lin. 6-35 r lin. 9) in or. pro marcello: init.: Diuturni silentii-1; 20-fin. [ed. laud. 295.7-296.17; 296.19-298.9]; inscr. et subscr. eodem modo quo in or. pro Ligario ut et in sequentibus partibus; (35 r lin. 10-37 v lin. 8) in or. pro rege deiotaro: init.: Deiotarus tetrarches-10; 32-fin. [ed. laud. 298.10-300.11; 300.13- 301.12]; (37 v lin. 9-48 v ) in or. pro sex. rosgio amerino: init.: Sextus roscius-20; 34-fin. [ed. laud. 301.13-305.21; 305.24-316.7]; (49^-53^) in or. pro lege manilia: 3...] lucullus.-fin. [ed. laud. 316.8-322.16] (48 v lin. uit. inscr.: Incipit Pompeiana); (54 r ~ v ) in or. pro milone : init.: Quodam tempore-l [ed. laud. 322.17-323.20] (53 v lin. uit. inscr.: Incipit Miloniana). Librarius ipse textum correxit, hic illic signum ü ad locos corruptos indicandos addidit, marginibus signa pro NB, lemmata, adnotationes adscripsit ut et altera manus paulo posterior, quae eadem textum correxit (13 v adnotavit: in hoe loco cor rupt (us) erat codex antiquus); teste Bischoff heiricus autissiodorensis hic illic litteras delevit; p. petavius lacunas adnotavit, l r marg. sup. titulum adscripsit: Veteris Grammatici In aliquot M. Tullij Orationes. Fragme(n)ta, in angulo dextro adnotavit: Hieron. Apol. 1. advers(us) Rufinu(m). Puto quodpuer — in Virgiliu(m) [i.16: PL 23, 428 C 8-429 A 1], An Vulcatij Gallicanj cui(us) extant ahq(uo')t Impp. vitae, quae eadem adnotatio prius in marg. inf. scripta et deinde erasa est. Is. Vossius codicem J. G. Graevio commodavit, cf. eius praef. edit. Oratt. Ciceronis (1, 1699), apographum codicis a J. Fr. Gronovio confectum, hodie est cod. Leid. Periz. <L 81,vid. [de Meyïer], Catal. Codd. Periz., 100. Ed. Jac. Gronovius (1692), praef.; M. Tullii Ciceronis Opera, ed. I. C. Orellius 5.2 (1853), 382 sqq.; W. H. D. Suringar, Historia critica Scholiastarum Latin. 1 (1834), 147 sqq.; Th. Stangl, Der sog. Gronovscholiast zu elf ciceronischen Reden (1884) (male dicit p. 3: ... Quart. 138 ...); P. Hildebrandt, De Scholiis Ciceronis Bobiensibus (Diss. Göttingen 1894); C. Brak man, De Ciceronis Scholiasta Gronoviano (Mnemosyne 34, 1906), 85 sqq.; Th. Stangl, Zur Textkritik des Gronovschen Cicero-scholiasten (Wochenschr. f. klass. Philol. 23, 1906), col. 360 sqq.; 382 sqq.; 471 sqq.; id., id. (Berlin. Philol. Wochenschr. 26, 1906),col. 1212 sqq.;